http://twitter.com/CorkAP
I have to confess, I have yet to tweet. But as a group we are now on twitter, so I will need to figure out how to make it sing
- Rory
PS Thanks to Miriam for setting this up

http://twitter.com/CorkAP
I have to confess, I have yet to tweet. But as a group we are now on twitter, so I will need to figure out how to make it sing
- Rory
PS Thanks to Miriam for setting this up
Reader Brian Barry sent in the following in the comments section -
“…I’m from Cork and I take Pinhole Photos. I exhibited in Lismore a year ago in the same place The C.A.P. did. It was a show about Cuba.
Anyway, I’m writing to let you know that I’m now making Pinhole Cameras and will be selling them for the first time in The Glucksman next weekend (Nov 6,7,8) at the annual Craftsfair. My cameras each contain a photo etching from my Cuba Obscura collection. I’ll also have my prints available over the few days. …”
I had a look at his website, and the pinhole photographs are great. If you are out and about in Cork this weekend, the Lewis Glucksman craft fair looks like an interesting place to spend some time.
- Rory
“The shortlist has been announced for this year’s Deutsche Börse photography prize. Anna Fox, Zoe Leonard, Sophie Ristelhueber and Donovan Wylie are all up for the £30,000 award, given annually to a photographer who has made a significant contribution to European photography. The winner of the 2010 competition, which focuses on themes of gender, nationality, surveillance and political conflict, will be announced 17 March 2010.”
Read about this on A Photo Student, and also The Guardian
- Rory
I don’t think about what camera I should use that much. I just pick up the one that looks nicest on the day
– William Eggleston
More gratuitous pictures of some damn sexy cameras from Tokyo Camera Style !!
- Rory
Lee Miller – self portrait in headband
Ooops! Should never leave a two week gap to write up notes! I’ll see what I can drag up from my tired ol’ brain cells on this one! Anyway, back on October 14th myself and a few other CorkAP’ers attended A Short History of Photography at the Lewis Glucksman Gallery, Week 3. Presented by Chris Clarke, Glucksman Curator of Education and Collections, was The Commercial Image, and a very entertaining and informative lecture it was too.
Chris began his lecture by discussing photography in advertising, and how photography is a realistic medium that is easily mass produced. One of the first images he showed was Lee Miller – self portrait in headband (above). Lee Miller was a model who became a photographer. As her career progressed, Miller became a key figure in fashion, war photography (documenting the 2nd World War for Vogue magazine), and contemporary art, as assistant, muse and lover of surealist artist Man Ray.
Edward Steichen – Kotex advertisment
Miller was introduced to Man Ray by Edward Steichen for whom she modelled for Kotex. At the time this was a very controversial advertisement, as it was the first time that an advertisment for a menstrual hygiene product featured a photograph of a person. But a taboo was broken, and advertising and photography broke new ground.
Steichen was a also cross over photographer between art and advertising, (and a war photographer during WW1). Advertising at this time (and ever since) promoted as much as anything else an aspirational lifestyle, and in photographs such as the one above, we see Gary Cooper depicted in a suave, wealthy, healthy, manner – very aspirational. That said, the difference between how men were depicted in advertising compared to women was stark enough. In both cases, very aspirational, artistic images are used, but images of women were much more objectified than those of men – “Lisa as V.O.G.U.E” by Horst P. Horst, below, being a case in point!
Horst P Horst – Lisa as V.O.G.U.E
Robert Piguet – Brigand Perfume
The way objects were depicted were also aspirational, sexualised, graphic. Robert Piguet’s ad for Brigand perfume is nothing short of phallic!
blow in her face and she’ll follow you anywhere (!!)
Cigarette advertising was probably the most explicit in terms of aspirational advertising, with explicit sexual conoctations, emphasising the point that, really, you want these. Of course, cigarette advertising has since been banned (at least in this part of the world – is it banned everywhere?), and to modern eyes the one above for Tipalet is shocking, objectional, and, well, kinda hilarious. Did they really get away with this stuff?!
By the 80’s cigarette advertising was very much curtailed, and advertisers had to become much cleverer. The advertisments became much more subliminal, pushing people on a subconcious level. The Silk Cut adverts, designed by Charles Saatchi were very clever, depicting a puple silk with a single slash in the fabric. Sublime, but not condoned!
Art photographers used advertising as a way to sell their work, as well as the product being advertised. David LaChapelle’s work is big, colourful and garish. The scenes he depicts are very much set up, not quite realistic. His advert for Evian is selling what he does as much as it is selling water. Advertising has always been used by many art photographers as a valid platform to show their work – Jurgen Teller and his Marc Jacobs ads, Oliviero Toscani and Benetton, Ed Ruscha Absolut Ruscha, Annie Leibovitz – Keith Haring. The list goes on, art photographers selling themselves and their work as much as the products they are commissioned to sell.
Annie Leibovitz – Keith Haring
It could be asked given a series of images such as these, are these photographers entirely promoting their own thoughts and ideas, or are they being influenced by their work in advertising, and is this affecting or changing how they work? Advertisers such as Benetton and Marc Jacobs are very keen to work with artists, designers, musicians and photographers. The association is seen, I guess, as mutually beneficial. Similarly, Keith Haring is an artist who alligns himself with photographers. The photograph that Leibovitz took of him definatley must have been mutually beneficial to both the artist and photographer. Of course, most photographers produce their own work as well as the commissions they do for advertisers. William Klein, a painter turned photographer, worked commercially for Vogue, and also took photos, such as “Supermarket and Gun”, which depicted the underlying conditions of the society we live in.
William Klein – Supermarket and Gun
….
At the end of the lecture (which didn’t end there, but it’s gone too late to write anymore! ), Chris set us all a task, dividing us into groups and electing people to speak. It was a bit of a jolt to those of us who expected to sit and listen, but it was fun to partake, think a bit about what had been discussed, and have a bit of banter back and forth. All in all a great couple of hours. Tomorrow evening is lecture number 5, The Photographer as Artist. Looking forward to it!
- Rory
Don McCullin – Shell Shocked Soldier
Lecture 2 of a Short History of Photography at the Lewis Glucksman Gallery was about Photography & Conflict, presented by Matt Packer, Glucksman curator of exhibitions and projects. Some of the photographs that he presented we had seen in week 1 with Fiona Kearney. She had talked about the history of photography, and the art that the eye of the photographer brought to these documents. What stood out to me during Matts’s lecture was the idea of the ethics of photography in situations of conflict.
Matt began the lecture by talking about the history of photography, and how technology changed the ways in which the war was brought home. In the early days, guys like Fenton and Brady needed horse drawn wagons to develop plates on the spot, and this largely prevented them from photographing the actual battle scenes – they general made pictures of the aftermath. As the technology progressed, particularly with the emergence of the Leice and 35mm film in 1925, photographers were able to become embedded with the soldiers, and photograph events as they happened. Robert Capa’s photographs of the Spanish Civil War, and later WW2, pioneered this type of photography in conflict. Not that Capa was immune to possibly fictionalising events either, as the controversary following his photograph “Death of a Loyalist Soldier, 1936″ was to prove.
Robert Capa – Death of a Loyalist Soldier
This photograph by Capa was controversial when it was first published, as it was the first time such an image had been made in the heat of battle. It proved controversial ever after too – was it fake?
Capa coined the famous phrase, “If your pictures aren’t good enough, you aren’t close enough”. During the D-Day landings, Capa was certainly close enough.
Robert Capa – American landing on Omaha beach, D-Day, 1944
This photograph is technically very flawed – shaky, too contrasty, over exposed. And yet it is a shocking masterpiece – a document showing exactly what was happening on the beach that day. Hardly surprising that Capa’s hand shook when he was that close – right in the middle of it. This was to become the working method of photographers ever after – being there in the thick of the conflict with the soldiers, dodging bullets, on the run, documenting what was happening.
Catherine Leroy – L’assaut de la côte 881
But what of the ethics of witnessing these atrocities?
George Rodger – Belsen Concentration Camp
George Rodger in 1945 went into the Bergen Belsen Concentration Camp tasked with making pictures of what was there. And despite the horror of what he witnessed, he needed to document the scene, to compose correctly, make a good photograph. In an interview later he said, “It wasn’t even a matter of what I was photographing, as what had happened to me in the process. When I discovered that I could look at the horror of Belsen – 4000 dead and starving lying around – and think only of a nice photographic composition, I knew something had happened to me and I had to stop. I felt I was like the people running the camp – it didn’t mean a thing”
Richard Drew – The Falling Man
Matt told us a story about how he had met Don McCullin, and spoke with him about the very famous photograph from the Sept 11th attacks in New York – “The Falling Man”. McCullin commented that the photograph should never have been printed. Matt didn’t understand this. Why would you not print and publish a photograph as important as this? McCullin argued that the photograph should have been taken but never printed. It was important for the photographer to bear witness. But it is an entirely different set of ethics to use the image, to publish it, and to receive royalties.
Today photographers are like antennae on the scene, and images are being sent instantly to picture desks. Is the photographer still ethically responsible for what is used, what is published? Or has that responsibility been taken from him?
James Nachtwey – Rwanda, 1994 – Survivor of Hutu death camp.
Choosing the photography of James Nachtwey as a case study, Matt shows that Nachtwey chooses his projects, and makes excellent, very emotive pictures. But what are the links between the projects? What research has been done? Looking at his website we see that he has been to all the modern war zones and places of conflict, disease, famine, pollution – Bosnia, Romania, Rwanda, etc. But where is the broader sense of context? There seems to be a homogenity of approach no matter what stricken region he is in. Are the photographs about what he has seen, or about him? The sense of ethical responsibility is evident on Nachtweys website however – the home page contains the quote, “I have been a witness, and these pictures are my testimony. The events I have recorded should not be forgotten and must not be repeated.”
Camera phone photo, London Underground, 07/07/05
Matt also discussed the idea of photojournalism in crisis. With modern technology, pictures are reaching the media from the general public using camera phones and so on. Has the value of the photo journalist been eroded by this? Robert Pledge argued that “… Certain individualists will doubtlessly continue the tradition of photojournalism. But books and exhibitions will be their media. They will produce long term stories, often grant supported, that will give us an understanding of the world different from the one we see on TV”
Which brings us to Photojournalism & Contemporary Art. As an example, Simon Norfolk uses a large format camera when photographing scenes such as this in Afghanistan. This format gives lots of detail, picture space, improves spatial relationships. It’s not taken on the battlefront – it’s the aftermath or periphery. It is primarily produced with a view to exhibition and a book. You get a sense of pathos with a photograph such as this. The photographer is engaging with people, not scambling about in the bushes avoiding bullets. Depicting the human farming activity in front of the ruins of the building, it attempts to display the human offort to build hope despite the evidence of destruction.
I have left out a lot more of what Matt discussed – it was a rather long lecture! But he concluded with a video, “Journalists Under Fire: Vietnam and Iraq”, featuring Don McCullin, Catherine Leroy, David Leeson, Mike Cerre and Jonathon Schell, discussing the ethics of photojournalism, what they witnessed, and how it affected them. I checked you tube, and here’s the 58 minute version -
After that heady evening, I’m looking forward to Week 3 – “The Commercial Image”
- Rory
Irving Penn has died at the age of 92.
From the NY Times “… In his catalog essay for a 1984 retrospective of Mr. Penn’s work at the Museum of Modern Art, John Szarkowski, then the museum’s director of photography, wrote, “The grace, wit, and inventiveness of his pattern-making, the lively and surprising elegance of his line, and his sensitivity to the character, the idiosyncratic humors, of light make Penn’s pictures, even the slighter ones, a pleasure for our eyes.” …”
- Rory
So last Wednesday Padraig and I attended the first of six lectures on a Short History of Photography at the Lewis Glucksman Gallery. The first weeks lecture was presented by Fiona Kearney, Director of the Glucksman gallery. Miriam didn’t make the first night, so this post could be titled “Notes for Miriam”!
The first slide that Fiona presented was of the first photograph ever made (or at least the earliest surviving), which was made by French inventor Niépce in 1827. This image was fixed on a metal plate, and showed a scene from a window of a house. The exposure would have taken many hours, and so the necessity of finding a place to keep the box still for that length of time probably dictated the scene produced as much as anything else.
Niépce collaborated with Louis Daguerre who went on, some 12 years later to patent a process known as the daguerreotype.
Daguerre – Boulevard du Temple, Paris, 1838
A daguerreotype is essentially a negative image, exposed directly onto a plate bearing silver halide. It is a single negative process, and prints cannot be made from the plate. Although the end result is a negative, the mirrored surface appeared as a positive when a dark background was reflected onto it.
Henry Fox Talbot, an English inventor, perfected his own process, and in 1839 invented the negative process. With his process, the calotype, many prints could be made from a single negative. Although the daguerreotype was more popular at the time (possibly because it was a free to use patent, unlike the calotype which was licensed), the fact that Fox Talbot’s calotype was a double negative process meant that it became the precursor to most late 19th and 20th century photographic processes.
Henry Fox Talbot – Latticed window in Lacock Abbey in 1835
Although the early photographers were essentially expert inventors and chemists, Fiona impressed upon us during her lecture that an artistic eye guided the creation of the image from the begining. The second photograph above, Boulevard du Temple, Paris, 1838, by Daguerre, is a wonderful example of this in my eyes. This is a technically interesting photograph, because the Boulevard appears to be empty, despite the fact that this should have been a busy street, full of life. The only apparent sign of life is the two figures towards the bottom left of the scene – a man standing still to have his shoes shined, and the shoe shiner. What has happened is that the exposure took so long that the only people that stayed still long enough to be recorded were the shoe shiner and his customer. I wonder if Daguerre and this man were in cahoots, as quite apart from the technical aspect, the two figures add enormously to the beauty of the scene.
Eadweard Muybridge – The Horse In Motion
From the begining, photographers were very influenced by painters, and painting, in turn, was influenced and changed by photography. One of the things that photography did was change the way that we see. Eadweard Muybridge was commissioned by Leland Stanford to scientifically prove whether or not all four hooves left the ground during a gallop (possibly so that Stanford could win a bet!). Muybridge achieved this with his “The Horse In Motion” series of photographs, and in so doing changed the way we see, and the way artists paint. No longer would paintings such as Epsom Derby by Théodore Géricault appear realistic. Indeed to modern eyes the horses in this painting appear to be flying rather than galloping, with all four hooves off the ground!
Théodore Géricault – Epsom Derby
And so some artists began to paint in such a way that now appears more realistic, since the invention of photography. Below is “Race Horses” by Degas. As you look at the painting, your eye is drawn to the startled horse in the center of the frame, and to modern eyes, this looks “more correct”, again due to photography.
*******
Marcus Sparling seated on Roger Fenton’s photographic van, Crimea, 1855.
Roger Fenton was the first photographer to go to war, commissioned in 1855 to the Crimean War to photograph the troops. Although he had to carry wagon loads of glass plates and chemicals, the photographs that were produced immediately changed the way foreign wars were reported on. Seeing the devastating impact of foreign war in images, rather than reading about them, had enormous impact – the written word could not compete.
Roger Fenton – The Valley of the Shadow of Death
The technology of the time meant that the photographer could not actually photograph the action as it happened, so early war photographs tended to be of scenes and landscapes – cannonballs on a road, dead bodies on the fields. And, long before photoshop, accusations of image manipulation were ripe. Did the photographer move the bodies to increase the impact of the horror of the scene. Were the cannon balls moved onto the road? And if so, was he morally right to do this?
*******
An image that was certainly manipulated, if that’s the right word, was “Fading Away” by Henry Peach Robinson in 1858.
Henry Peach Robinson – Fading Away
This photograph was made from five different plates, or negatives. At the time, this was a shocking image to its audience. It depicts a dying woman being attended to by two nurses or family members, with her husband staring mournfully out a window in the background. It was a shocking image, considered too real, despite the fact that paintings of such a scene were commonplace. It was the apparent realism of the photograph that shocked his audience, who considered it a step too far.
Fiona’s lecture also looked at the impact that photography made on the environment right from the early days. The formation of Yosmite as a National Park came about partly because of the photographs that were taken there. As people travelled there to make photographs of the natural beauty, so it was recognised that tourism was a new factor, and steps were made to preserve such places.
Photography moved away from trying to emulate painting, and the fashion for pictorialism was replaced by a search for “truthfulness” in photography by photographers such as Weston and Ansel Adams. But still the artistic eye led the way, composition improved, and the idea of photography as an art form was fought for and grew stronger.
We can see the path from where photography began gives us a clue to where we are now. The world is aware that images can be and are often manipulated. A photograph is not always truthful. But an artist can use photography to make a statement about the world he lives in now.
Sean Hillen – Viewing the Ice Floes
- Rory
I don’t look at Flickr half as much as I used to (picture overload!), but one photographer who always stuck out to me there was Tommy Oshima from Japan. His images are very beautiful and creative, and all film. For some reason he popped into my head this evening, and I had a new look to see what he’s up to. “Agents” above is just one of hundreds of great photographs on his page. Definately a guy I’d like to see exhibited on this side of the world.
- Rory
******************
Featured comment by Tommy Oshima
“… Thank you so much for this post and your compliments!
I’m quite honoured!Few of my works will be hanged in one of the Gallery that will be opening in December in Amsterdam, as their Permanent Collection. I also wish I’ll be able to have my show in Ireland in the future!
I will announce more details about the Gallery in Amsterdam within a month, so please hold on. ….”
Saw this on A Photo Editor. I like this video. I like his honesty, and his thoughts. His photography is great. A painting is never about a brush, not really. A painting becomes an object in its own right. Photography, in the same way, is never about the camera. A cursary glance at Flickr will tell you that. Nor is it about the light (ok, it’s all about light, but …). It’s about a vision, what someone sees, and how they make it work. I think Richardson’s work is full of energy, life and imagination. Knowing the right people helps of course. But it’s all about his vision. That’s what makes it work. To hell with the camera
- Rory
Ok, this is a bit off topic for CorkAP, and I admit I lifted it straight from the very popular Strobist website, which of course is very digital centric. But none of that matters, because photography doesn’t exist without light, and flash existed long before digital cameras. So drop all your anti-digital preconceptions, and take a look at this very informative vid. It’s flash light made easy
- Rory
Mark Sink is a Denver based Art Photographer specialising in the wet-plate collodion process. Some examples of his work can be seen on his blog page (click here). He also hosts workshops with The Denver Darkroom group and Working with Artists. This is something I’d really like to learn.
- Rory

“… The last of the great French mid-century photographers has died. Willy Ronis, who had been on dialysis and in a wheelchair for some time, entered a Paris hospital several days ago. Stephane Ledoux, head of Eyedea Presse, owner of Rapho agency, said he was “bright and spirited to the end.” He was 99.
Ronis is best known for his pictures of everyday life in Provence and in Paris, in particular the working-class districts of Belleville and Montmartre. His most famous picture is “Le Nu Provencal,” a nude of his wife, Marie-Anne Lansiaux, bending over a sink in a rustic bathroom. …”
Read On at The Online Photographer
- Rory
Loved the imagery in this little film, and a great tune too from the imimitable Tom Waits. Nothing to do with photography mind you …
- Rory

“Reflections” was one suggestion for the name of our exhibition in Gallerie Nautique back in July. You know the kind of thing, thoughts of artists as they Reflect on life, the way a photograph Reflects reality, all that kind of artsy nonsense. “Echos” was another idea put forward. And dismissed forthwith. Who were we trying to fool? So we went with “Exhibition # 3″. No matter what pretentious idea you could come up with for a name like that, you can’t deny that it does what it says on the tin. It was our third exhibition. Exhibition # 3.
After the opening night (which was a great success, and thanks to all who came), we all pretty much forgot about photography for a while. To be honest although I had the paper, I really couldn’t face scanning it until today. Well, not so much couldn’t face, as couldn’t be bothered! But to use an old cliche, a break’s as good as a rest, and we’re raring to again. First meeting back is this Monday coming, and hopefully we’ll be back in the darkroom again soon too. Which will give us something to scan, and post up here. So, new work on the way, and less of me typing to myself (does anyone read this?) on a Saturday afternoon
- Rory
Now the easiest kind of a job was a murder, because the stiff would be laying on the ground. He couldn’t get up and walk away and get tempermental and he would be good for at least two hours
Came across this great link to some mp3’s taken from a rare old vinyl lp “Famous Photographers Tell How” in which some of the greats, amongst them Weegee and HCB, talk about their picture making process. Looks like a great blog for any vinyl lovers out there too (and I’m referring to records here!).
“…Arthur Fellig adopted the name Weegee or “Weegee the Famous,” alluding to the Ouija board and his knack for being first on the scene is in his days as a roving news and street photographer. It wasn’t an accident or any supernatural pre-disposition that he was there first at the fires, murders and general mayhem that he recorded in Gotham. …”
Click here for more from Boogie Weegie Flu
- Rory

We formed Cork Analogue Photographers sometime in June or July last summer, 2008. Can’t remember exactly, but an email, a meeting in a pub, and we were off. Since then we have put on three exhibitions, starting with Brew Cafe in Cork last September, then Lismore Gallery and Studio and Gallery Nautique earlier this summer. Not a bad first year! The first post made on this site was one year and one week ago, Aug 6th ‘08. Since then there have been a further 102 posts, and last month, July had the highest number of visitors with 936. Not very high in internet terms, but I guess someone is looking.
The above image has nothing to do with birthdays, but Man Ray was one of my early influences in photography – when I discovered him, and realised what could be done in the darkroom (solarisation, rayographs), as well as with a camera, I was hooked
- Rory

After two weeks away from computers and email (bliss!), I’m back online and will be updating CorkAP website again. The last few days of the holidays were spent in Caherdaniel, near Sneem in Co. Kerry. I spent four nights there – two with my family, and two with CorkAP’ers Jason, Dee, Sanda and Ann, and our friend Roseanne. Padraig and Brian chickened out. The above photo was taken on Sandas digicam along the Kerry way, and shows us with some heavy duty film equipment – ie my ancient Mamiya, Jasons ancient Russian Leica copy and a cheap and flimsy tripod! I’d love to say that I will post some beautiful shots from the Mamiya when I get them scanned, but I , um, loaded the film the wrong way. Aw well …
- Rory
Sally Mann talks about taking photographs on landscapes that were battle fields during the American Civil War, and goes on to take about the collodion process that she uses and the serendipity of imperfection.
- Rory

Beyond life’s dark edges … Nan and Brian in the bed, 1983, part of Nan Goldin’s The Ballad of Sexual Dependency
“One of the reasons I supported and like all the photographers in the show I’ve curated,” writes Nan Goldin, in her catalogue introduction to the 40th Arles photography festival, “is that they seek to express their own truths.”
Those truths tend to be of the hard-hitting variety: the photograph as a record of survival, a testament to – and defiance of – the darkness that often attends lives lived beyond the boundaries of so-called normal society. Goldin’s most celebrated work, The Ballad of Sexual Dependency, is an epic semi-autobiographical narrative of survival, part installation, part ever-evolving stills-based film. It has become a touchstone for those who seek to lay bare their lives with a camera. …. read more by clicking here
From last Sunday’s Observer
- Rory